Re:Voyager 1 is back online! NASA spacecraft returns data fr...
by bpfrh on Saturday June 15, 2024 @09:26AM
(#40689661)
Doesn't modern electronics require massive shielding?
e.g. you would need too much shielding and would go over the 1 gram restriction.
Re:Voyager 1 is back online! NASA spacecraft returns data fr...
by minitoar on Saturday June 15, 2024 @11:37AM
(#40690416)
If you have enough of them you can just lose some fraction and still function.
Re:Voyager 1 is back online! NASA spacecraft returns data fr...
by flaminHotSpeedo on Saturday June 15, 2024 @01:42PM
(#40691281)
Also it may work out that a lighter, faster probe with a shorter service life could have a greater effective range, if the service life is less sensitive to weight changes than the speed is
Re:Voyager 1 is back online! NASA spacecraft returns data fr...
by minitoar on Monday June 17, 2024 @11:32AM
(#40706652)
Right, that’s a nice way of thinking about it.
Re:Voyager 1 is back online! NASA spacecraft returns data fr...
by SoftTalker on Saturday June 15, 2024 @10:50AM
(#40690162)
And how do you get the data back from these probes? The voyagers have antennas that are close to 4 meters in diameter and ~25-watt radio transmitters. You aren't doing that in a gram, and you aren't powering that in a gram either.
Re:Voyager 1 is back online! NASA spacecraft returns data fr...
by minitoar on Saturday June 15, 2024 @11:36AM
(#40690409)
Just go read the starshot proposal. They address all of these issues, some more convincingly than others but they have thought it out in great detail.
In short, it’s a swarm of gram-scale probes and they work together to transmit.
Also, at this scale, not much can be done by hand, so you can make hundreds of them for not much more cost than doing one.