News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Paul Graham's Letter to YC Companies by cdixon on Tuesday June 05, 2012 @01:22AM (#4067448)
Yes. Wall Street grades Facebook by drawing lines through dots of revenues and margins. The more accurate way to view Facebook is as a powerful coil that can spring in multiple directions. (I say this as someone who questions whether Facebook is a positive force on the web).
Re:Paul Graham's Letter to YC Companies by jcampbell1 on Tuesday June 05, 2012 @02:05AM (#4067557)
This is a cryptic comment. Yes, Wall St views Facebook as a powerful coil, but no one knows if it is compressed or stretched, but it certainly is.

All it takes is for Facebook to go from $4 a user/yr to $8, or for teenagers to say "email me, I don't check facebook often". A powerful coil indeed.

Re:Paul Graham's Letter to YC Companies by kamaal on Tuesday June 05, 2012 @03:40AM (#4067781)
>>"email me, I don't check facebook often"

Facebook exists because I would not like 500 friends to email me every day about their photos or jokes. That sort of thing doesn't scale well with emails.

Re:Paul Graham's Letter to YC Companies by mtkd on Tuesday June 05, 2012 @06:42AM (#4068128)
Social networks exploded because they created an interaction that previously wasn't possible.

They have now become a tax on life - like email. A set of hygiene actions you have to perform every day.

Do not underestimate how much the next generation does not want to conform to the restrictions of the previous generation.

It's entirely possible future generations do not want to be tracked and targeted 24/7 - they may choose to just switch off and drop out.

50% youth unemployment in some first world countries right now. These guys may just decide to do things differently - what is social technology doing for them right now?

Re:Paul Graham's Letter to YC Companies by sokoloff on Tuesday June 05, 2012 @07:20AM (#4068187)
Helping them pass the time certainly, and perhaps helping them get laid.

You're dead right that each generation wants to be in a social space that feels "theirs", but I don't think that precludes using the same infrastructure.

When I was a teen, I drove on the same roads and used the same telco and USPS as my parents, even at my most rebellious times. In Facebook's case, each user "feels" a tiny piece of the overall universe, and one which is vastly disproportionately populated with people they've mutually selected. That, coupled with meeting jwz's use case above, makes me feel that Facebook is pretty well positioned to succeed.

Re:Paul Graham's Letter to YC Companies by GFKjunior on Tuesday June 05, 2012 @09:46AM (#4068591)
Terrible comparison, I use the roads because there are no other, better alternatives. When given a choice I always pick UPS or FEDEX over the post office for shipping, and looking at the financial position of the USPS I am in the majority.

Those industries exist because of the government monopoly, a new better social network can arise in an instant.