News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Building a faster, smarter, Chromebook experience with th... by account42 on Thursday June 13, 2024 @08:59AM (#40669094)
What is your reason for believing the closed source nature of nVidia's graphics drivers played a role in their success? AMD's and Intels Windows drivers are also closed source and so were AMD's Linux drivers when nVidia managed to secure the lead.

nVidia is also finally moving to an open source kernel module so a closed source one doesn't seem important to them for keeping their moat.

Re:Building a faster, smarter, Chromebook experience with th... by michaelt on Thursday June 13, 2024 @09:55AM (#40669688)
Presumably amadeuspagel means nvidia has walked a careful line with CUDA & ML.

CUDA is much more accessible/documented/available than a lot of comparable products. FPGAs were even more closed, more expensive and had much worse documentation. Things like compute clusters were call-for-pricing, prepare to spend as much as a small house.

On the other hand, CUDA is closed enough the chips that run it aren't a commodity. If you want to download that existing ML project and run it on your AMD card - someone will have to do the leg work to port it.

That means they've been able to invest quite a lot of $$$ into CUDA, knowing the spending gets them a competitive advantage.