The uninformed preliminary answer instead is yes: loaded dice can produce better values.

The article is about using LLMs in an evolutionary framework to design better algorithms for LLM advancement, with particular occasional regard to preference optimization algorithms - and guess what, it seems it worked.

You'll need the following law too,

No clickbaity article is worth reading.

Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something.

(From the guidelines)

Fine then: “don’t write articles with question headlines or people can safely assume the answer is no.”

I like the idea of respect where this comes from, but I think that titles have been perverted by SEO way too much and at some point I need writers to stop trying to lure me for my own good.

I wish we can get descriptive, boring, but accurate titles back.

Descriptive titles have their place, but so do titles that arouse curiousity and need you to read TFA.

I hate clickbait, but this doesn't look like this one is, because it's not misleading, it's not trying to hide something to get you to click, and does not lure you with information that's not in the article.