This is called research, and it does require citations.
Please do not harass overachievers who do the research work instead of just talking to talk.
#areyouarobotorsimilar
The heuristics should be improved, then; we shouldn't ask me to put these in PDFs without typed edges to URLs and schema.org/Datasets, to support a schema.org/Claim or a ClaimReview in a SocialMediaPosting about a NewsArticle about a ScholarlyArticle :about a Thing skos:Concept with a :url.
Would you have deep linked your way to those resources (which are useful enough to be re-cited here for later reference) without the researcher doing it for you?
Technical writing courses for example advise to include the searches that you used in the databases that you found oracles in, in order to help indicate the background research bias prior to the hypothesis at least.
Transparency and Accountability: https://westurner.github.io/hnlog/
So, this sort of cited input is valuable and should be valued not as link spam but as linked edge-dense research sans generatble prose.
I'm not writing a doctoral thesis. These comments are not my livelihood. I'm just sharing industry knowledge on a topic I know about.
Your random links without context, some of the links to literal Google searches, are not in any way useful or interesting.