Noam Chomsky 'no longer able to talk' after 'medical event'

Re:Noam Chomsky 'no longer able to talk' after 'medical event' by hdbenne on Tuesday June 11, 2024 @08:38AM (#40645526)

If I recall, he did explain himself… it boiled down to it being none of your or my business. I despise Epstein, but as he was heavily involved in finance, I am sure many people had dealings with him that were not sexual in nature.

You can find many things that Noam missed the mark on. To err is human. But this is conspiratorial and not fair. If you were judged by all the people you had financial or social dealings with I’d imagine you would share a similar sentiment.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Noam Chomsky 'no longer able to talk' after 'medical event' by jasonvorhe on Tuesday June 11, 2024 @10:38AM (#40646687)

Jeffrey Epstein was sus ever since he appeared because of the way he suddenly rose up in ranks, got handed billions of dollars without having done any significant deals himself. His connections to Mossad and US elites should've raised red flags for someone like Chomsky. I see no reason to give anyone dealing with Epstein the benefit of the doubt.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Noam Chomsky 'no longer able to talk' after 'medical event' by Jerrrrry on Tuesday June 11, 2024 @07:11PM (#40652725)

Replace Epstein with "The Clintons", and this is actually even more objectively true.

course, that would be a social demerit - a paddlin', boy.

[ Parent | on HN ]