Re:XScreenSaver is available on Android. Google requires a p...
by ColinWright on Monday June 10, 2024 @03:50PM
(#40637951)
> Maybe just link to the actual source (https://www.jwz.org/xscreensaver/google.html) rather than some random social media post?
I did submit that and it was DOA, and I saw that there was another post of the original which was also DOA, so I submitted the post where I saw the reference.
Re:XScreenSaver is available on Android. Google requires a p...
by tappdarden on Monday June 10, 2024 @03:21PM
(#40637493)
turns out. the testicle cup referrer is still active.
Re:XScreenSaver is available on Android. Google requires a p...
by 79a6ed87 on Monday June 10, 2024 @03:40PM
(#40637810)
Odd, I didn't get it when I clicked on that link
(IIRC jwz's "testicle cup" image HN referrer redirect is no longer active/functional.)
Anyway, I get that jwz loves to be inflammatory toward everyone because that's who he is, but if Google didn't require privacy policies for every listed app, I'm sure a bunch of people would be crying foul.
I could easily imagine a shitty ad-supported screensaver that was somehow using your data to target/sell ads. Remember that we live in a world where flashlight apps have been used to exfiltrate data from phones. Or perhaps a more innocuous use of user data: maybe the app tracks which screensavers are used and sends that data to the developer.
And, regardless, I see no problem with a company not wanting to have to do manual review to determine what apps do and don't require privacy policies, and just blanket-requiring them of everyone.