Super Heavy has splashed down in The Gulf of Mexico

Re:Super Heavy has splashed down in The Gulf of Mexico by sebzim4500 on Thursday June 06, 2024 @02:00PM (#40600449)

I think the only other external camera was on the fin that disintegrated, so I wouldn't have high hopes.

They will have had internal cameras pointed at the structure looking for hot spots, and presumably those will have been fine

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Super Heavy has splashed down in The Gulf of Mexico by cubefox on Thursday June 06, 2024 @08:57PM (#40604222)

"will have had", "will have been" - amazing construction

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Super Heavy has splashed down in The Gulf of Mexico by hrnnnnnn on Friday June 07, 2024 @01:05AM (#40605503)

Future perfect and future perfect continuous, respectively, if you're interested in the names.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Super Heavy has splashed down in The Gulf of Mexico by tsimionescu on Friday June 07, 2024 @02:35AM (#40605889)

They're both future perfect I believe, of the verbs "to have" and "to be". Future perfect continuous is "will have been filming", this was "will have been fine".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Super Heavy has splashed down in The Gulf of Mexico by hrnnnnnn on Friday June 07, 2024 @07:53AM (#40607735)

What's the difference between those two?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Super Heavy has splashed down in The Gulf of Mexico by tsimionescu on Friday June 07, 2024 @05:17PM (#40613098)

"Will have been filming" is the future perfect continuous form of the verb "to film", while "will have been blue" is the future perfect form of the verb "to be", with "blue" as a subject complement.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Super Heavy has splashed down in The Gulf of Mexico by hrnnnnnn on Thursday June 20, 2024 @12:42PM (#40740648)

Makes sense, thanks for clarifying.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Super Heavy has splashed down in The Gulf of Mexico by cubefox on Friday June 07, 2024 @09:10AM (#40608401)

To give them names destroys the magic a little

[ Parent | on HN ]