News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Rejecting GMOs hinders human progress and keeps the poor ... by grumbelbart2 on Wednesday June 05, 2024 @02:47AM (#40582057)
> We definitely need more GMO crops to feed the planet

That, too, is debatable. Google "Do we have enough food" - we could feed 10B people with what we produce. Feeding the world is currently more a matter of donating (who pays?) and distributing it, not so much of producing the food in the first place.

> namely the lack of pesticides, of which some may be dangerous (but often regulated)

There is also overfertilization, which puts nitrates into ground and ultimately drinking water, and the over-use of herbicide, which massively strains local ecosystems to their collapse. The farmer revolts in Europe over the last 1-2 years have shown how politically difficult any kind of regulation in this area is. The EU is now backing down. It seems to be very difficult to find a middle ground in the "excessive vs. organic" spectrum.

Re:Rejecting GMOs hinders human progress and keeps the poor ... by xboxnolifes on Wednesday June 05, 2024 @03:19AM (#40582241)
> Feeding the world is currently more a matter of donating (who pays?) and distributing it, not so much of producing the food in the first place.

Yes, but if food can become X% more abundant do to increased yield or survivability in previously unsurvivable climates, distribution and costs can become that much less of an issue.

Re:Rejecting GMOs hinders human progress and keeps the poor ... by v7n on Wednesday June 05, 2024 @02:58AM (#40582126)
Distribution is in itself a problem, yes, but there's also the geopolitical angle of depending on foreign imports to feed a nation.
Re:Rejecting GMOs hinders human progress and keeps the poor ... by danpalmer on Wednesday June 05, 2024 @03:07AM (#40582171)
Yeah this is a complex problem. It does seem the case that we probably have enough food globally, but not at a national level. Also it seems that we don't have sufficient food for everyone to live at the level of the average American or European, so arguably there's benefit there in increasing food production. Also a large population still farm every day, being able to reduce the time input for farming could increase productivity by freeing people up to do other things.