In general, yes.

Though you seldom get deregulation by just deleting laws. Most of the time deregulation means replacing one regulation with a different set (that is hopefully simpler, but not always).

> In general, yes.

Eh, I disagree, in general. I see little benefit.

Just FYI, Greta Thunberg is considered persona non grata now.

By whom? She is still one of the world's foremost figures in the fight against climate change, but also in other activist fights (like the fight against apartheid in Israel).

Here in Germany she is considered an antisemite now. All the Green party allies have publicly distanced themselves from her.

She always seems more of a drama activist than a real activist but she has every right to be that. If her drama gets more young people involved in environmental issues it’s win-win. I bear her no ill will, but I don’t seek out news about her. So she’s certainly not considered with a blanket status of “person non grata”

Deregulation is great when the law is unfounded or unfair. There is much to little “revisiting” of laws to see if they actually did what they said they did. Otherwise said regulation is useless and just costing society wasted energy and time. I think we need more government agencies studying such things to create a feedback loop so that if it’s failing it gets removed.