Let's see, hedge funds in NYC get 10% of the increase in value of their fund, typically in billions of dollars. NYT has nothing to say about that. Instead, they wish to target Musk who took Tesla from a startup to the 600 billion behemoth that it is today, all the while doing more for sustainable energy than anybody else. As a shoreholder from 2018, I am incensed by the activist Delaware judge who reversed my vote 6 years ago!

Why would they have anything to say about 10% increases in fund values? That's literally what hedge funds exist to do and that's what they're advertising they will do.

You're a highly irrational investor. Suffice to say, funds are rational.

you do not reward somebody like Musk for past performance or for perception heroics. You reward them for future performance.

Guess what: EV car supply is a logistic supply curve, and it's flattened, and the response from Tesla has been predictable and sensible: drop price.

So what is the future earnings potential of this share holding now?

This is nonsense. Nobody rewards for future (unknown) performance. What kind of logic is that?

As a shareholder, why do you want to be so diluted?