News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build... by anon291 on Sunday June 02, 2024 @12:52AM (#40551468)
Is Colorado building meaningful amounts of trains?
Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build... by s_dev on Sunday June 02, 2024 @04:12AM (#40552367)
Switzerland has incredible trains and train networks. Just before people chime in with "Trains are good but mountains are too much of a challenge so might work in other places better with a flat geography".

Sounds reasonable until you see how the Swiss do it. Nobody said that but that's where I feel this conversation is going and the previous commenter did say 'buses first'. Probably to exploit the existing road network and achieve ambitious goals in a piece meal manner.

Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build... by thsksbd on Sunday June 02, 2024 @09:09AM (#40553807)
Colorado is five times larger and has a much smaller population.
Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build... by izacus on Sunday June 02, 2024 @10:11AM (#40554287)
Which should make construction much easier, faster and cheaper due to lack of expensive private land boyouts.
Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build... by CPLX on Sunday June 02, 2024 @11:24AM (#40554899)
Almost none of that population lives in the mountains.

Colorado is half Switzerland and half Kansas. Literally everyone minus a rounding error lives on the flat part.