Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build...
by angmarsbane on Saturday June 01, 2024 @09:40PM
(#40550682)
Culver City?
Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build...
by ohmyiv on Saturday June 01, 2024 @10:03PM
(#40550752)
Yes, exactly! Lol I take it you've been or live there? Afternoon traffic is ridiculous and even in surrounding areas like Palms and Mar Vista, which I think are people avoiding Culver City. Just way too many drivers here in general.
Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build...
by CalRobert on Sunday June 02, 2024 @01:00AM
(#40551503)
You are not wrong - this is where personal, private, transportation excels. And why Culver city desperately needs a quality network of safe, protected, bike infrastructure. Cars don't scale, but bikes do.
Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build...
by ohmyiv on Sunday June 02, 2024 @01:53AM
(#40551708)
I wholeheartedly agree with you. If there was safe and protected infrastructure, I feel a lot more people, including myself, would bike, especially with all the new e-bikes available. I will give Culver City some credit because they do have some dedicated bike lanes but they're not really protected.
Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build...
by CalRobert on Sunday June 02, 2024 @11:08AM
(#40554787)
When I lived in Santa Monica it was supposedly building a great network of bike lanes. That was twelve years ago…
Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build...
by kjkjadksj on Sunday June 02, 2024 @01:12PM
(#40555680)
Santa monica has the best bike network in socal honestly
Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build...
by CalRobert on Sunday June 02, 2024 @02:10PM
(#40556116)
Well the bar is pretty damn low. There's nowhere I'd really feel safe letting an 8 year old bike to school.
Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build...
by Karrot_Kream on Sunday June 02, 2024 @05:59PM
(#40557489)
> but the buses are still mostly empty except for students and laborers who live outside the city.
You take the bus so this goes without saying but, let's say a bus is mostly empty and has 8 people inside. If you were to put those 8 people into individual cars, you'd make the road a lot more crowded. I think a lot of folks look at these mostly-empty buses and don't realize that most cars are mostly-empty also (average 1.5 occupants / car in most of the US, honestly probably lower in the LA area due to its sheer car centricity.) But of course if you're in a car you're more likely to view another driver as "someone like you" while you look at the bus and think of it as a waste of space and taxpayer money.
The last time I went through there driving, it took almost 20 mins to go 2-3 miles due to traffic (and stop lights), obviously during rush hour. The buses were still nearly empty (I wished I didnt have to drive that day). At a non-rush hour time, it takes me maybe 20 mins for my whole trip home which is about 9 miles.
My point, I guess, is it's not always just having a free bus lane. There are a lot of people that need convincing to take buses and alternative transportation. A few of my coworkers wish they could take the bus/train, but having kids in school and other things make it a bit harder for them.
Maybe one day...