News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:X is justifiably slow by paulddraper on Saturday June 01, 2024 @09:29PM (#40550650)
Booting itself was several minutes. And I had one machine where Word took multiple minutes to start, never knew why. Maybe if I defrag for the umpteenth time.

---

And significantly less reliable.

Remember how common crashes were? (Including BSoD!)

Like, you can solve 90% of memory crashes by using a memory managed language but that is course has costs.

Re:X is justifiably slow by xyzzyz on Saturday June 01, 2024 @10:03PM (#40550747)
I clearly remember that booting Windows 95 on my 386SX was under one minute. I remember measuring this.
Re:X is justifiably slow by slavik81 on Sunday June 02, 2024 @12:21AM (#40551319)
The 386SX ran at 16 MHz, was seven years old at the release of Windows 95 and was slightly below the stated minimum system requirements. By contrast, I had a 166 MHz Pentium (released four months after Windows 95) and I remember it being slow enough that I would go do something else while it booted.

I see references that mention that installing fonts can significantly impact boot time. Maybe the installed software and devices had a significant impact.