News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build... by akira2501 on Saturday June 01, 2024 @04:05PM (#40548666)
In the first level analysis.

Once you realize the sheer amount of commerce and business that is enabled by roads you see that they pay for themselves several times over.

Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build... by thriftwy on Saturday June 01, 2024 @04:40PM (#40548907)
Once you realize the sheer amount of commerce and business that is enabled by a decent metro system you see that they pay for itself several times over.

That's even easier to measure because these gains are localized.

Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build... by akira2501 on Saturday June 01, 2024 @04:47PM (#40548946)
Right. So let's have both! You can't replace the capabilities of roads with metro and you can't replace the convenience of a metro with roads.

Specifically, though, viewing roads or metro as a "loss leader" is probably an inappropriate analysis.

Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build... by prmoustache on Saturday June 01, 2024 @05:38PM (#40549284)
Actually, it has been shown that removing cars increase commerce.
Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build... by akira2501 on Saturday June 01, 2024 @05:41PM (#40549299)
This is a universal outcome with research to back it up?
Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build... by prmoustache on Saturday June 01, 2024 @06:06PM (#40549454)
yes but I am about to go to bed so the link mihht come only tomorrow.

Also some studies have calculated the impact on health in the society and calculated a cost to the society per km of driving a car and the money saved when doing the same km walking or with a bicycle.