Well that quote sounds like exactly the kind of person you'd want in command of a powerful AGI.

Who could be in command of a powerful AGI? Couldn't anyone with temporary access to the system have it generate a game plan for how that person can steal the agi?

Powerful LLM, you mean. AGI isn't there, and with this approach won't be - MS may have all the models, but if it still misses people who are needed to make better models, it's a delusion in my book. Let Satya think he got it covered.