News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Armor from Mycenaean Greece turns out to have been effective by legitster on Friday May 31, 2024 @02:30PM (#40538706)
> “Such suits of armor were recorded in palace archives—in the equipment lists of those complete or needing repair. This indicates they were supplied at the expense of palatial centers,” says Flouris. They were bloody expensive and thus financed, maintained, stored, and issued during emergencies by the state. Mycenaean palatial centers disappeared around 1200 BCE, and the supplies of Dendra-type armor disappeared with them.

So... it sounds like the armor was kind of ceremonial in a way. Even if it was functional it didn't sound very practical - it only existed as a projection of force and wealth in defensive situations.

Re:Armor from Mycenaean Greece turns out to have been effective by travisjungroth on Friday May 31, 2024 @02:49PM (#40538893)
You could say the same thing about intercepter aircraft and it’s a real stretch to call those ceremonial.
Re:Armor from Mycenaean Greece turns out to have been effective by peterarmstrong on Friday May 31, 2024 @04:02PM (#40539595)
Hey, in Canada the newest model will be! Next year we'll have, what, four F-35s? We'd almost be better off making a bunch of that bronze armour and the cool hats...
Re:Armor from Mycenaean Greece turns out to have been effective by zknow on Friday May 31, 2024 @10:25PM (#40542368)
As a fellow Canadian I gotta agree on this one.
Re:Armor from Mycenaean Greece turns out to have been effective by Bayart on Saturday June 01, 2024 @05:53AM (#40544308)
Working out as a projection of force assumes its usefulness at impressing force.
Re:Armor from Mycenaean Greece turns out to have been effective by alpaca128 on Saturday June 01, 2024 @06:20AM (#40544420)
One glance at the pictures tells me there's no way this design is for ceremonial use. This armor looks like a prime example of function over form.