I wonder how many people think your comment is a source for your claims.
>That's a complex question with no clear answer.
Yes, this is corruption. Lack of transparency is a benefit to the stronger powers.
> How do the accountants allocate overhead and other indirect costs besides resident wages?
They get to write off indirect expenses in taxes AND get tax dollars. Its even worse than it appears.
Most teaching hospitals are non-profits, often owned by educational institutions or state/local governments. They don't "write off" expenses from an income tax perspective because they aren't subject to income tax in the first place. Cost accounting as a discipline is only loosely related to financial accounting or tax accounting.
As for corruption, there are probably ways the current system could be improved. But you haven't presented any evidence of widespread illegal activity.
>But you haven't presented any evidence of widespread illegal activity.
Its an immoral activity to corner a market, take tax dollars, lower quality for consumers, and raise prices. Its not illegal.
Its the hourly rate they whine about and if you ever met a resident, they count their sleeping/napping hours for some reason.
Wait til you learn about EMTs and paramedics. EMTs can be making as low as $11/hr. And at the last ambulance service I worked at there was no upper cap on hours. The only restriction was you had to be off-duty for 8 hours after every SIXTY on-duty.
Given that they have this valuable resource for an incredibly low wage - where is all the money for residency going? Why do hospitals require such a large subsidy to fill the gap?
This isn’t an accusation that hospitals are misusing the money - I genuinely do not understand the costs that go into residency here.