Re:Priced out of home ownership – 'It makes me want to throw...
by lazide on Tuesday May 28, 2024 @09:36AM
(#40500619)
The issue is it takes significant pressure over time for any real effect to occur here.
Think San Francisco or New York in the 70’s type of ‘urban decay’. [https://amp.theguardian.com/cities/2015/may/18/welcome-to-fe...
A one-off broken window, or never cutting your grass isn’t going to do anything.
Realistically? High central bank rates for awhile does the same thing.
1974 had a fed rate of 10.74%, 1975 5.82%, etc. [https://www.macrotrends.net/2015/fed-funds-rate-historical-c...]
Re:Priced out of home ownership – 'It makes me want to throw...
by __MatrixMan__ on Tuesday May 28, 2024 @01:28PM
(#40503170)
But we don't control the fed. The degree to which these investments are risky is our only lever.
Re:Priced out of home ownership – 'It makes me want to throw...
by lazide on Tuesday May 28, 2024 @03:57PM
(#40504908)
Unless you’re forming your own street gang (or conspiracy in the city planning dept.), my point is that you aren’t meaningfully influencing how risky the investment is either.
Re:Priced out of home ownership – 'It makes me want to throw...
by __MatrixMan__ on Tuesday May 28, 2024 @11:30PM
(#40508156)
I was going to go with "union", but I suppose "gang" does the same thing, just so long as it's a significant percentage of the population, organized and acting with restraint and purpose. Because I agree, a random act here and there wouldn't do the trick.
A few high profile jury nullifications would probably be sufficient, but we gotta be the rational economic agents that the theories think we are and work together on this.