Re:Reclaiming IPv4 Class E's 240.0.0.0/4
by dboreham on Monday May 27, 2024 @08:23PM
(#40496131)
There was a proposal called TUBA (TCP/UDP with Bigger Addresses). It was voted down in favor of IPng.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Reclaiming IPv4 Class E's 240.0.0.0/4
by throw0101b on Monday May 27, 2024 @08:55PM
(#40496319)
> There was a proposal called TUBA (TCP/UDP with Bigger Addresses). It was voted down in favor of IPng.
"IPng" was the general thing that would come after IPv4, and not a specific proposal.
The specific proposal that was chosen (over TUBA (aka ISO's CLNP), as well as CATNIP) was Simple Internet Protocol Plus (SIPP):