And linked lists with reference counting are really easy to do, and don't have any leaks if you don't allow cons cell abuse. (which would mess with immutablity anyways)
You could also do linear types like carp [0], or you could just do manual memory management.
I feel like most people will call something with macros and s-expressions, a reasonable, if brutalist, lisp.
Can you provide a source for this? Common Lisp and its predecessors certainly do not have immutable data structures out of the box. The usual data structures are cons cells, lists (composed of cons cells anyway), vectors, and hash tables.
> I would be very interested if it’s possible to create an extremely simple garbage collector or an ergonomic Lisp that isn’t garbage collected, but a solution doesn’t spring to mind.
PreScheme immediately comes to mind for me as does ulisp. The latter in particular is designed for microcontrollers with limited memory.
Lisp traditionally has immutable data structures and a garbage collector, in which case I would consider it more complicated than LO.
I would be very interested if it’s possible to create an extremely simple garbage collector or an ergonomic Lisp that isn’t garbage collected, but a solution doesn’t spring to mind.