> That is not a fallacy, it is in fact coded into international humanitarian law that a state actor must follow international humanitarian law under all circumstances.

And yet, you have ZERO demands on Palestinians following international law, or Iranians, or ... You also have ZERO options for how to make them, in fact when attempting to discuss how to respond to violations of international law, you keep refocusing on past guilt of Israel in this or that event.

This, despite the fact that Palestinians and Iranians have actually signed the international treaties that they will respect international law, including the Rome Statute, which means Palestinians, to respect international law, now have to destroy Hamas, and deliver it's leaders to the authorities. They also signed that they would not take hostages, and now should deliver the hostages without any conditions. So enforcement is a valid thing to ask about, isn't it?

> It is a fallacy to assume that governments are driven by hatred and are unable to control their state’s response to unethical acts.

Again, how does this apply to Palestinians? And, how will you enforce their behavior to change?