The post above mine was perfectly reasonable; there's absolutely no reason it should have been flagged.

I am unable to vouch, so hopefully someone who is reading this will please do so.

It's not dead, so there's nothing to vouch. It's best to just proceed without reference to things like votes; they work themselves out over time.

Anyways: one such report, about the conference, is via MEMRI. MEMRI is itself not really all that trustworthy! I would steer away from any analytical results! But this piece is largely direct quotes. Maybe they're fabricating them. Seems a little unlikely, though?

https://www.memri.org/reports/hamas-sponsored-promise-hereaf...

Notably, a bunch of more mainstream sources corroborated this report (just Google for the name of the conference). I think it's very likely to be legitimate.

Yup, they're pretty freaky. But if their quotes pan out with other sources, they may be useful. Thanks for posting.