Re:'Right to roam' movement fights to give the commons back ...
by cratermoon on Wednesday May 22, 2024 @10:54AM
(#40441776)
In most of the US, the attractive nuisance doctrine applies, unfortunately. And nearly anything can be considered an attractive nuisance, or at least there's probably a lawyer out there willing to take the case and cost the landowner money.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:'Right to roam' movement fights to give the commons back ...
by bbarnett on Wednesday May 22, 2024 @11:02AM
(#40441888)
Quite so. I get doubly annoyed when people have heated pools by lakes, the lake is clearly not fenced, but that fence had better be on your pool.
And many pools have a shallow end, and many homeowners have long docks, which are in deep water.
Yet docks aren't required to be fenced here.