Re:Mapping the Mind of a Large Language Model
by whimsicalism on Tuesday May 21, 2024 @11:49AM
(#40430015)
i don’t see why any of the things you’re describing are criteria for thinking, it seems just arbitrarily picking things humans do and saying this is somehow constitutive to thought
Re:Mapping the Mind of a Large Language Model
by verdverm on Tuesday May 21, 2024 @11:52AM
(#40430054)
It's more to point out how far the LLMs we have today are from anything that ought to be considered thoughts. They are far more mechanical than anything else
Re:Mapping the Mind of a Large Language Model
by whimsicalism on Tuesday May 21, 2024 @11:54AM
(#40430104)
you’re just retreating into tautologies - my question was why these are the criteria for thought
it’s fine though, this was as productive as i expected
Re:Mapping the Mind of a Large Language Model
by verdverm on Tuesday May 21, 2024 @12:02PM
(#40430217)
I'm not listing criteria for thought
I'm listing things that current LLMs cannot do (or things they do that thinking entities would not) to argue they are so simple they are far from anything that resembles thinking
> it’s fine though, this was as productive as i expected
A product of your replies becoming lowering in quality, and becoming more argumentative, so I will discontinue now
This is currently done with multiple LLMs and calls, not within the running of a single model i/o
Another example would be to input a single token or gibberish, the models we have today are more than happy to spit out fantastic numbers of tokens. They really only stop because we look for stop words they are trained to generate and we do the actual stopping action