My comment was directly influenced by the article.

In the sense that they both contain the word "AI?" Otherwise, I'm not really seeing the connection to the article. I.e.,

> One constant in most of these stories appear to be that most educators have no interest in educating themselves about AI.

This article does not discuss or show this.

It explicitly says that the lawsuit filing showed a distinct lack of understanding by the University of what LLMs are/how they work.

Does it say the lawsuit was filed by most educators, or anything about their interest in educating themselves? This represents a minority of educators and says more about administrators than educators. And says nothing about the broad claim GP is making about their interests.