News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Statement from Scarlett Johansson on the OpenAI "Sky" voice by charlieyu1 on Monday May 20, 2024 @08:26PM (#40422481)
But why? Sounds like a violation to the rights of the sound actor
Re:Statement from Scarlett Johansson on the OpenAI "Sky" voice by whoknowsidont on Monday May 20, 2024 @08:44PM (#40422668)
Because it's meant to give the _appearance_ or _perception_ that a celebrity is involved. Their actions demonstrate they were both highly interested and had the expectation that the partnership was going to work out, with the express purpose of using the celebrity's identity for their own commercial purposes.

If they had just screened a bunch of voice actors and chosen the same one no one would care (legally or otherwise).

Re:Statement from Scarlett Johansson on the OpenAI "Sky" voice by janalsncm on Tuesday May 21, 2024 @12:12AM (#40424033)
What OpenAI did here is beyond the pale. This is open and shut for me based off of the actions surrounding the voice training.

I think a lot of people are wondering about a situation (which clearly doesn’t apply here) in which someone was falsely accused of impersonation based on an accidental similarity. I have more sympathy for that.

But that’s giving OpenAI far more than just the benefit of the doubt: there is no doubt in this case.

Re:Statement from Scarlett Johansson on the OpenAI "Sky" voice by sneak on Tuesday May 21, 2024 @01:41AM (#40424572)
I think "beyond the pale" is a bit hyperbolic. The voice actor has publicity rights, too.
Re:Statement from Scarlett Johansson on the OpenAI "Sky" voice by whynotminot on Monday May 20, 2024 @09:05PM (#40422846)
Sounds like one of those situations you'd have to prove intent.

(and given the timeline ScarJo laid out in her Twitter feed, I'd be inclined to vote to convict at the present moment)

Re:Statement from Scarlett Johansson on the OpenAI "Sky" voice by jahewson on Tuesday May 21, 2024 @12:25AM (#40424111)
Not necessarily, because this would be a civil matter, the burden of proof is a preponderance of the evidence - it’s glaring obvious that this voice is emulating the movie Her and I suspect it wouldn’t be hard to convince a jury.
Re:Statement from Scarlett Johansson on the OpenAI "Sky" voice by sangnoir on Monday May 20, 2024 @09:45PM (#40423136)
> Sounds like one of those situations you'd have to prove intent.

The discovery process may help figuring the intent - especially any internal communication before and after the two(!) failed attempts to get her sign-off, as well as any notes shared with the people responsible for casting.

Re:Statement from Scarlett Johansson on the OpenAI "Sky" voice by charlieyu1 on Tuesday May 21, 2024 @02:48AM (#40424955)
I guess the Trump lookalike satire guy would not want to go to California then
Re:Statement from Scarlett Johansson on the OpenAI "Sky" voice by actionfromafar on Tuesday May 21, 2024 @06:28AM (#40426533)
Ah, so OpenAI does satire. That explains a lot.
Re:Statement from Scarlett Johansson on the OpenAI "Sky" voice by csomar on Monday May 20, 2024 @11:06PM (#40423623)
I am guessing it's because you are trying to sell the voice as "that" actor voice. I guess if the other voice become popular on its own right (a celebrity) then there is a case to be made.
Re:Statement from Scarlett Johansson on the OpenAI "Sky" voice by mandmandam on Tuesday May 21, 2024 @05:45AM (#40426213)
Did you read the statement? They approached Scarlett twice, including two days before launch. Sam even said himself that Sky sounds like 'HER'.

This isn't actually complicated at all. OpenAI robbed her likeness against her express will.