News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Calculus with Julia by tiffanyh on Saturday May 18, 2024 @06:46PM (#40402715)
LuaJIT faster

I find it interesting that after all these year of little development on LuaJIT, and active development in Julia - that LuaJIT is still faster (while also being general purpose).

https://julialang.org/benchmarks/

Re:Calculus with Julia by slwvx on Saturday May 18, 2024 @06:49PM (#40402736)
I find it interesting that after all these years of HN, commenters still ignore the main topic of the OP (a calculus book) to focus on the language it's written in
Re:Calculus with Julia by dang on Saturday May 18, 2024 @07:17PM (#40402873)
Please don't respond to a bad comment by breaking the site guidelines yourself. That only makes things worse.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:Calculus with Julia by dang on Saturday May 18, 2024 @07:17PM (#40402874)
"Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:Calculus with Julia by gc9 on Saturday May 18, 2024 @07:12PM (#40402842)
Note that "The benchmark data shown above were computed with Julia v1.0.0" (2018)
Re:Calculus with Julia by patagurbon on Saturday May 18, 2024 @06:56PM (#40402766)
LuaJIT is only appreciably faster on text ingestion and printing in those benchmarks. Julia is also plenty general purpose, just targeted (initially at least) towards the numerical community. LuaJIT is fantastically impressive though.
Re:Calculus with Julia by neonsunset on Sunday May 19, 2024 @08:11AM (#40406395)
Now they need to include .NET and System.Numerics.Tensors but that would make a lot of popular options look bad :)

(particularly go which has no business being used in this area)