Re:Show HN: Pico: An open-source Ngrok alternative built for...
by marssaxman on Tuesday May 14, 2024 @09:57PM
(#40362297)
Why on earth would you reuse such a long-established name? Pico has been around for 35 years and many distros include it by default (or symlink `pico` to nano, anyway).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN: Pico: An open-source Ngrok alternative built for...
by andydunstall on Tuesday May 14, 2024 @11:36PM
(#40362826)
I didn't know there was already a long-established project called Pico :)
As someone suggested below, I'll rename to 'Piko'
Re:Show HN: Pico: An open-source Ngrok alternative built for...
by inferiorhuman on Wednesday May 15, 2024 @02:47AM
(#40363833)
Post GPL3 Apple replaced GNU Nano (itself a Pico clone) with UW Pico. A step backwards perhaps, but nano is a symlink to pico. I'd steer clear of anything that looks/sounds like 'pico' including 'piko' which doesn't seem to clear anything up.
Re:Show HN: Pico: An open-source Ngrok alternative built for...
by marssaxman on Wednesday May 15, 2024 @10:48AM
(#40367675)
Ahh, what different worlds we all live in, unknowingly! :-)