News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Silicon Valley once chafed at dictatorships. Then came a ... by dyauspitr on Tuesday May 14, 2024 @06:26PM (#40360873)
That would be fine if we didn’t selectively pick which countries we apply those rules to. China is an ethical nightmare but we have and continue to do business with them, why change that when it comes to the Middle East.
Re:Silicon Valley once chafed at dictatorships. Then came a ... by smallmancontrov on Tuesday May 14, 2024 @06:40PM (#40360979)
What makes you think people who disapprove of getting in bed with the Middle East approve of getting in bed with China? Did you ask them? Or did you want so badly to accuse them of hypocrisy that you simply assumed it to be the case?
Re:Silicon Valley once chafed at dictatorships. Then came a ... by gklitz on Wednesday May 15, 2024 @12:30AM (#40363118)
There aren’t any people left in business in the US who don’t approve of “getting in bed with china”

- this message was made in china, like your shirt, your shorts, your socks, and so on snd so on.

Re:Silicon Valley once chafed at dictatorships. Then came a ... by bennyhill on Wednesday May 15, 2024 @01:37AM (#40363438)
There's no people who deny travel reimbursements that use Saudi gas.. Does that mean we all need to fly to Saudi Arabia to plan future businesses and garrison death squads in our houses?

I think there's a difference between doing the minimum that is not a disadvantage and making a relationship with an ethical discount country your competitive advantage.

Re:Silicon Valley once chafed at dictatorships. Then came a ... by addicted on Wednesday May 15, 2024 @11:53PM (#40375045)
The U.S. has done far more business for far longer with countries in the Middle East than it has with China.

I don’t think your example supports the point you think you’re making.