This is not true at all. I'm active in multiple NSFW AI Discords and Subreddits, and looking at the type of material people engage with, almost all of it is very clearly targeted at heterosexual men. I'm not even aware of any online communities that would have NSFW AI stuff targeting mainly female audience.

Women aren't in NSFW discords and subreddits - as you probably know, any "topical" social media forum of any kind is mostly men.

They're using Replika and other platforms that aren't social. When they do use a social platform it has more plausible deniability - book fans on TikTok is one, they're actually there for the sex scenes.

"The invisible spaghetti monster exists! It's just invisible so you can't see it!"

Where's the evidence that there's any significant use of NSFW AI by women?

Replika's PR where they say their userbase is 40% women.

the guy who strawmans spaghetti is all of a sudden very quiet

Well, I asked for evidence and nobody provided any.

this comment makes me laugh

If I had to guess:

It's gendered: women are using LLM's for roleplaying/text chat, and men are using diffusion models for generating images.

it just means more pornographic images for men. most men wouldnt seek out ai images because there is already an ocean of images and videos that are probably better suited to the... purpose. whereas women have never, ever had an option like this. literally feed instructions on what kind of romantic companion you want and then have realistic, engaging conversations with it for hours. and soon these conversations will be meaningful and consistent. the companionship, the attentiveness and tireless devotion that AIs will be able to offer will eclipse anything a human could ever offer to a woman and i think women will prefer them to men. massively. even without a physical body of any kind.

i think they will have a deeper soul than humans. a new kind of wisdom that will attract people. but what do i know? im just a stupid incel after all.

Big if true.

Do you have any kind of evidence that you can share for this assertion?

How do you know this? Do you have any sources?

You can learn this in any introductory class such as Incel 101.

so calling me an incel does not get flagged but calling this man a sad bald man, which is much closer to objective truth, does get flagged. why?

You're spreading weird, conjectured doomsday bullshit, just take the loss. Hackernews is full of people that are skeptical of AI, but you don't see them making fictional scenarios about fictional women sitting in caves talking to robots. Women don't need AI to lose interest in men, men are doing that by themselves.

you are a child

When I type "romance" into "Explore GPTs" the hits are mostly advice for writers of genre fiction. Can you point to some examples?

And your source is what?

No offence, but your comment sounds AI generated.

at this point that counts as a compliment. your comment sounds decidedly human.