News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Adam Curtis on the dangers of self-expression (2017) by coldtea on Sunday May 12, 2024 @12:53PM (#40335829)
>Is this supposed to be a bad thing?

Yes.

>Because, if that's what you're saying, then what is your idea of "art"? Something that you can buy, have promptly delivered and hanged on a wall to decorate a space and get compliments from passers-by?

Let's start with making a space more beautiful, and see where it takes us from here.

Definition could also include connecting with us (difficult if "divorced" from our tastes), enriching the culture, and serving a higher purpose...

>Would you like if all music was something designed to be played on the radio or in malls to decorate musically the environment?

You got it backwards. That's what modern art is currently. Only that the environment isn't a mall but a gallery or some rich person's wall.

That's why its "wildly divorced from the tastes of the majority of people in society".

Because it's either banal or high concept wankery. So like music being either musack or some avant guarde exercize for other academics to applaud. In the art world we could use some Beatles or Animal Collective or Aphex Twin or Aurora or Tame Impala or even some Taylor Swift and Luis Fonzi.

There are no comments on this comment yet.