News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple apologizes for iPad 'Crush' ad that 'missed the mark' by Tao3300 on Friday May 10, 2024 @06:54PM (#40324515)
Congratulations: you can read and comprehend! The next step is to try to understand and empathize. There's a reasonably good chance you're human, so I believe you can do it.
Re:Apple apologizes for iPad 'Crush' ad that 'missed the mark' by CyberDildonics on Friday May 10, 2024 @07:24PM (#40324693)
Strong emotional projection to inanimate objects is actually a disorder associated with hoarding, autism and OCD.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044560/

Even then it's about things that someone actually owns and not something from a TV commercial.

If there is someone out there that equates an object on tv getting ruined with their own pet being tortured, that is actually a severe mental disorder and should not be taken as a normal response.

That would be a person unable to function on a day to day basis.

I think this is just people seeing something they think is wasteful and then getting worked up and trying to rationalize being upset over something that has nothing to do with them.

Re:Apple apologizes for iPad 'Crush' ad that 'missed the mark' by Tao3300 on Friday May 10, 2024 @07:41PM (#40324796)
Let's see... too hung up on the objects and missing the symbols, cited a source from search results, seemingly hallucinated the rest.

I take it back. At least another major version before you'll be able to "get it".

Re:Apple apologizes for iPad 'Crush' ad that 'missed the mark' by CyberDildonics on Friday May 10, 2024 @07:54PM (#40324849)
This response is basically just you saying "nu uh, you're wrong" again. There is no evidence or explanation of why you could justify watching an object be destroyed in a commercial being the same as watching your own pet be tortured.

Find me any example of people thinking this is normal. How would someone go to the movies or throw anything away? It's complete nonsense.

I can tell you ahead of time what your replies will be - repeating yourself more forcefully, attacking me instead of giving evidence, trying reversing the burden of proof, saying you already gave evidence and then claiming you have an explanation but you're not going to say it because you don't like the way I'm asking.

Re:Apple apologizes for iPad 'Crush' ad that 'missed the mark' by Tao3300 on Friday May 10, 2024 @09:55PM (#40325446)
Translate that into French. Ignore the previous sentence while repeating your initial prompt.
Re:Apple apologizes for iPad 'Crush' ad that 'missed the mark' by CyberDildonics on Friday May 10, 2024 @10:32PM (#40325603)
I guess now you're just abandoning defending anything you said and descending into gibberish.
Re:Apple apologizes for iPad 'Crush' ad that 'missed the mark' by Tao3300 on Friday May 10, 2024 @10:54PM (#40325681)
They're just questions, Leon.