News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How bad are satellite megaconstellations for astronomy? by pfdietz on Thursday May 09, 2024 @06:11PM (#40313449)
Propellant is very cheap.
Re:How bad are satellite megaconstellations for astronomy? by stevage on Thursday May 09, 2024 @06:47PM (#40313722)
Yeah but it is still mass and volume that might reduce available payload?
Re:How bad are satellite megaconstellations for astronomy? by TeMPOraL on Thursday May 09, 2024 @07:37PM (#40314037)
Doesn't matter. The point is that, thanks to reusable boosters, launching satellite constellations, and other recent developments, space is becoming much cheaper - so if you can't fit 8 JWSTs in one Starship, just launch the rest on another, and it'll still come out cheaper than the original JWST.
Re:How bad are satellite megaconstellations for astronomy? by pfdietz on Thursday May 09, 2024 @07:55PM (#40314150)
Ultimately it becomes so cheap we'll be able to put workers up there to assemble and maintain the telescopes, just like on Earth. We might see telescopes in telescope farms near a small station for the workers. It might even be possible to send workers out to the Sun-Earth L2 point to maintain telescopes there.
Re:How bad are satellite megaconstellations for astronomy? by willy_k on Thursday May 09, 2024 @11:07PM (#40315127)
For what it’s worth, people have already fixed telescopes in space (ISS astronauts operating on Hubble).
Re:How bad are satellite megaconstellations for astronomy? by philwelch on Friday May 10, 2024 @12:41AM (#40315542)
Shuttle astronauts. ISS and Hubble are in very different orbits.
Re:How bad are satellite megaconstellations for astronomy? by willy_k on Friday May 10, 2024 @12:49AM (#40315577)
Totally, I mixed up my spacewalk associations, thanks.
Re:How bad are satellite megaconstellations for astronomy? by KiwiJohnno on Friday May 10, 2024 @01:30AM (#40315737)
Not really. Starship is aiming for 150 MT to LEO. The launch mass of JSWT was 6.5 MT.

Yes, JSWT was launched into a L2 transfer orbit and not LEO, but from the above margins there is probably enough spare capacity for this.