News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple introduces M4 chip by jocaal on Tuesday May 07, 2024 @03:24PM (#40290388)
> better for edge AI than whatever is out there, so I'm looking forward to this

What exactly are you expecting? The current hype for AI is large language models. The word 'large' has a certain meaning in that context. Much larger that can fit on your phone. Everyone is going crazy about edge AI, what am I missing?

Re:Apple introduces M4 chip by jitl on Tuesday May 07, 2024 @03:33PM (#40290501)
Quantized LLMs can run on a phone, like Gemini Nano or OpenLLAMA 3B. If a small local model can handle simple stuff and delegate to a model in the data center for harder tasks and with better connectivity you could get an even better experience.
Re:Apple introduces M4 chip by SmellTheGlove on Tuesday May 07, 2024 @03:37PM (#40290542)
> If a small local model can handle simple stuff and delegate to a model in the data center for harder tasks and with better connectivity you could get an even better experience.

Distributed mixture of experts sounds like an idea. Is anyone doing that?

Re:Apple introduces M4 chip by cheschire on Tuesday May 07, 2024 @04:27PM (#40291054)
Sounds like an attack vector waiting to happen if you deploy enough competing expert devices into a crowd.

I’m imagining a lot of these LLM products on phones will be used for live translation. Imagine a large crowd event of folks utilizing live AI translation services being told completely false translations because an actor deployed a 51% attack.

Re:Apple introduces M4 chip by jagger27 on Tuesday May 07, 2024 @05:28PM (#40291707)
I’m not particularly scared of a 51% attack between the devices attached to my Apple ID. If my iPhone splits inference work with my idle MacBook, Apple TV, and iPad, what’s the problem there?
Re:Apple introduces M4 chip by moneywoes on Tuesday May 07, 2024 @05:51PM (#40291944)
what about in situations with no bandwidth?
Re:Apple introduces M4 chip by mr_toad on Tuesday May 07, 2024 @09:23PM (#40293422)
Using RAG a smaller local LLM combined with local data (e.g. your emails, iMessages etc) can be useful than a large external LLM that doesn’t have your data.

No point asking GPT4 “what time does John’s party start?”, but a local LLM can do better.

Re:Apple introduces M4 chip by jwells89 on Wednesday May 08, 2024 @01:02AM (#40294489)
This is why I think Apple’s implementation of LLMs is going to be a big deal, even if it’s not technically as capable. Just making Siri better able to converse (e.g. ask clarifying questions) and giving it the context offered by user data will make it dramatically more useful than silo’d off remote LLMs.
Re:Apple introduces M4 chip by callalex on Tuesday May 07, 2024 @03:39PM (#40290571)
In the hardware world, last year’s large has a way of becoming next year’s small. For a particularly funny example of this, check out the various letter soup names that people keep applying to screen resolutions. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Display_resolution_standards...
Re:Apple introduces M4 chip by jchanimal on Tuesday May 07, 2024 @03:30PM (#40290461)
It fits on your phone, and your phone can offload battery burning tasks to nearby edge servers. Seems like the path consumer-facing AI will take.
Re:Apple introduces M4 chip by gopher_space on Tuesday May 07, 2024 @04:36PM (#40291144)
> Everyone is going crazy about edge AI, what am I missing?

If you clone a model and then bake in a more expensive model's correct/appropriate responses to your queries, you now have the functionality of the expensive model in your clone. For your specific use case.

The size of the resulting case-specific models are small enough to run on all kinds of hardware, so everyone's seeing how much work can be done on their laptop right now. One incentive for doing so is that your approaches to problems are constrained by the cost and security of the Q&A roundtrip.