Re:Face detection using HTML5, javascript, webrtc, websocket...
by tylermenezes on Saturday May 26, 2012 @10:05PM
(#4028982)
Seems to me you could have just had Jetty/OpenCV send back the coords of the faces, then have Javascript draw a box around them. Would have saved quite a bit of bandwidth and removed the need for experimental APIs.
Re:Face detection using HTML5, javascript, webrtc, websocket...
by cr4zy on Saturday May 26, 2012 @11:16PM
(#4029082)
I think you would still want WebRTC and Web Sockets to stream the webcam to Jetty/OpenCV. Yeah, he could have sent just coords back to save on bandwidth though.
Re:Face detection using HTML5, javascript, webrtc, websocket...
by zobzu on Saturday May 26, 2012 @07:10PM
(#4028663)
s/HTML5/HTML-ng/
Just because HTML5 != work in every HTML5 browser.
"Numbers don't mean anything anymore they say". Well for HTML5 thats pretty much spot on.. and that's unfortunate.
Re:Face detection using HTML5, javascript, webrtc, websocket...
by walrus on Sunday May 27, 2012 @02:09AM
(#4029411)
I was talking about the part you put in quotes:
"Numbers don't mean anything anymore they say"
Normally quote marks (the " character) are used if you're quoting something, so I was wondering where you are quoting that from. To be pedantic, what I'm looking for is a citation (of the quote, not of the fact).
It doesn't require WebSockets or Jetty. Just good ol' JavaScript/HTML5. Nothing more.
Just because HTML5 != work in every HTML5 browser. "Numbers don't mean anything anymore they say". Well for HTML5 thats pretty much spot on.. and that's unfortunate.
The demo's cool tho :)
(Pretty sure the dictionary has a different interpretation of "standard"). Google != your brain.