Re:New way to have complex discussions
by stavros on Tuesday May 07, 2024 @05:24AM
(#40283726)
So a tree, but worse.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:New way to have complex discussions
by basil-rash on Tuesday May 07, 2024 @07:57AM
(#40284470)
What makes you say it’s worse?
The underlying conceptual structure is still a tree, but now you have to unfold it into a line, with one reply potentially having nothing to do with the one before it (because they're on very different branches).
Re:New way to have complex discussions
by basil-rash on Tuesday May 07, 2024 @01:05PM
(#40288417)
No, the underlying structure is a DAG. I've already stated this, and that heavy UI affordances should be made to support ease of interaction with this model.
4chan threads are more like DAGs
The graph of 4chan threads are definitely cyclical, since they can include back-references.
Re:New way to have complex discussions
by basil-rash on Tuesday May 07, 2024 @08:07AM
(#40284529)
To be cyclical they’d need to have elements in reply to a post made after they were created. Including back references is a way of adding more parents, not children.
Re:New way to have complex discussions
by philosopher1234 on Tuesday May 07, 2024 @11:10AM
(#40286584)
You can reference posts that haven’t happened yet
Re:New way to have complex discussions
by basil-rash on Tuesday May 07, 2024 @01:06PM
(#40288446)
You are referring to providing a sequential post ID past the current latest? That is more of a quirk of their naming convention than a product feature. UUID's, for instance, would not support this, and checks could be made in either case to prevent it.