Re:Microsoft bans U.S. police departments from using enterpr...
by vidarh on Thursday May 02, 2024 @04:11PM
(#40240870)
Mosy cameras in the UK are private, rarely working well, and usually not networked or easily accessible to the police. It could be better, but the idea of the UK as a surveillance state is seriously overblown outside of maybe a handful of streets.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Microsoft bans U.S. police departments from using enterpr...
by phantompeace on Thursday May 02, 2024 @06:35PM
(#40242134)
Don’t forget ANPRs that can track your vehicle all around the country. Doesn’t even have to cross paths with a police car - they’re at most major junctions and all over the motorway
Re:Microsoft bans U.S. police departments from using enterpr...
by fennecbutt on Friday May 03, 2024 @10:08AM
(#40247834)
Good. But still doesn't stop the absolute fkwits doing 110mph around the m25 every day; how they get away with it I have no idea.
Re:Microsoft bans U.S. police departments from using enterpr...
by 1attice on Friday May 03, 2024 @12:57PM
(#40249783)
Because you can't boil a frog by starting at 100°C.
You introduce the surveillance as a way of mitigating extreme, rare occurrences, like terrorism.
You gradually make it common to use when solving major crimes, like murders.
Only then do you start tracking down traffic infractions.
Doctorow calls this the 'Shitty Technology Adoption Curve' https://pluralistic.net/2022/08/21/great-taylors-ghost/