Re:LLMs Can't Do Probability
by zrezzed on Wednesday May 01, 2024 @07:25PM
(#40230853)
I agree it’s equivalent, and that’s a great way to think about it.
But… I wouldn’t be surprised if humans answered closer to the LLM results than 80:20. I’d actually be surprised if humans converged very close to the right result.
But… I wouldn’t be surprised if humans answered closer to the LLM results than 80:20. I’d actually be surprised if humans converged very close to the right result.
Would be a fun mechanical Turk experiment to run.