Re:Apple's 'incredibly private' Safari is not so private in ...
by eastbound on Wednesday May 01, 2024 @03:53PM
(#40228508)
Sweet, UE can now legitimately take 4% of Apple’s global income for uniquely identifying all users on Earth, having undeletable cookies and not having the cookie banter and thus, breaking GDPR.
Re:Apple's 'incredibly private' Safari is not so private in ...
by ykonstant on Wednesday May 01, 2024 @04:12PM
(#40228739)
>the cookie banter
brilliant
Re:Apple's 'incredibly private' Safari is not so private in ...
by hehdhdjehehegwv on Wednesday May 01, 2024 @04:38PM
(#40229067)
Having worked in this sector for a very long time I just don’t think GDPR is an effective regulatory tool. Primarily because Ireland is a regulatory/tax haven for American companies and they have to enforce GDPR…and they refuse to.
Whereas DMA was written to totally avoid that problem; so I think a DMA action is WAY more likely as the Irish can’t block it.
Re:Apple's 'incredibly private' Safari is not so private in ...
by moi2388 on Thursday May 02, 2024 @02:30AM
(#40233290)
EU* and it’s up to 10% of global revenue.
Re:Apple's 'incredibly private' Safari is not so private in ...
by hehdhdjehehegwv on Thursday May 02, 2024 @03:39PM
(#40240573)
GDPR is 4% and technically EEA rather than EU. DMA is 10%.
That’s just my read of the article, I haven’t reviewed the code myself.
However, I will say that the way SV companies tend to operate is they refuse to do any compliance work until forced by circumstance, then they have to do a rush job and a bunch of stuff gets fucked up that would have been fine if they planned ahead based on statutory requirement.
So from a human/corporate behavior perspective this is exactly what I’d expect.
Likewise, Apple in particular has a holier than thou attitude, especially in regards to privacy, so I think there’s a bit of them being blinded by their own arrogance in this case.