News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:LLMs Can't Do Probability by nathan_compton on Wednesday May 01, 2024 @02:48PM (#40227559)
This doesn't really have anything to do with the language model. The temperature only has to do with the _sampling_ from the probability distribution which the language model predicts. In fact, raising the temperature would eventually cause the model to randomly print "left" or "right," (eventually at 50/50 chance) not converge on the actual distribution which the prompt suggests. I suppose if you restricted the logits to just those tokens "left" and "right", softmaxed them, and then tuned the temperature T you might get it to reproduce the correct distribution, but that would be true of a random language model as well.

I think its pretty simple and straightforward: the model simply fails to understand the question and can reasonably be said to not understand probability.

Re:LLMs Can't Do Probability by zrezzed on Wednesday May 01, 2024 @07:53PM (#40231098)
This matches my understanding, thanks. I thought I was going crazy reading other comments.
Re:LLMs Can't Do Probability by sigmoid10 on Thursday May 02, 2024 @04:37AM (#40233991)
That's just not true. At least not more or less than when performing the same experiment on humans.