News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why is simple decoration so rare in recent work? by keiferski on Wednesday May 01, 2024 @01:34AM (#40219831)
The simple fact of the matter is that people have essentially zero expectations when it comes to aesthetics in the public realm. This lack of expectations also comes with a lack of education, which means that they both lack aesthetic literacy and don’t care about correcting it.

Hence you get hoodies and sweatpants as the default fashion and boxes as the default building style. It has very little to do with actual cost of making the items. None of this will change until it becomes socially unacceptable to dress poorly or build an ugly house. And considering that H. L. Mencken commented on the “American lust for the hideous” a century ago, it’s probably never going to get better.

Re:Why is simple decoration so rare in recent work? by danielscrubs on Wednesday May 01, 2024 @01:47AM (#40219927)
Had to check it out for myself. "The American Libido for the Ugly" https://www.thoughtco.com/libido-for-the-ugly-by-mencken-169...
Re:Why is simple decoration so rare in recent work? by keiferski on Wednesday May 01, 2024 @01:50AM (#40219946)
Yeah he employed a few versions of that phrase. I heard him use it in this (excellent) interview, which is the only recording of his voice.

https://youtu.be/QpGzpqU-b04?si=Lhpsz4N30zV1Hqi0