News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Rabbit R1: Barely Reviewable [video] by kevinkeller on Tuesday April 30, 2024 @12:35AM (#40207283)
These AI assistants (Rabbit R1, Humane AI Pin), as they exist now, probably can be replaced by apps. However, if you give them the benefit of the doubt and think about what they're supposed to be (or eventually will be), owning the platform is a must.

An example: Google/Apple doesn't allow third-party apps access to call audio. So you couldn't implement live translation/transcription, by just being an app.

Google/Apple will jealously guard their turf in their ecosystems (to make space for their own AI assistants probably), so this level of third-party access is unlikely to be forthcoming.

Re:Rabbit R1: Barely Reviewable [video] by tazu on Tuesday April 30, 2024 @12:39AM (#40207300)
I agree as someone who's wanted to develop an iOS app for years but can't get over the App Store monopoly risk.

But, from a business sense, doesn't it seem like they're doing it backwards? Why not make a best-in-class AI assistant app, build a big userbase, and take the money to research hardware and harass Apple concurrently? Why start with hardware first?