If an article is AI, it's essentially spam, because there could be a thousand more similar written.

Raising awareness so others too can flag TFA

The quality of the article is what should drive voting and flagging.

Your personal opinion as to what level of AI tooling was used in crafting the content is a low value signal and posting that speculation without meaningfully engaging in the content is as low value as commenting to say "this article sucks".

Personally, I think this would be a very strange place to find pute AI genetated content. This is a personal statement that was submitted to the state, and posted under a real name under a site the poster has a professional association with. I think that any "strangeness" in formating a wording comes from the role this text serves, as a public comment intended to affect policy.

Why would I want to read some AI-generated slop? It's no different to spam, other than techbros being okay shoving it everywhere and anywhere it doesn't belong.