SB-1047 will stifle open-source AI and decrease safety

Re:SB-1047 will stifle open-source AI and decrease safety by iptq on Monday April 29, 2024 @10:57AM (#40199155)

This entire article feels like it was written by ChatGPT. For instance, it continuously makes vague claims about the value of open source without even citing the original bill.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:SB-1047 will stifle open-source AI and decrease safety by jsheard on Monday April 29, 2024 @11:04AM (#40199254)

The eagerness to summarize points in bulleted lists is a ChatGPT-ism as well.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:SB-1047 will stifle open-source AI and decrease safety by exe34 on Monday April 29, 2024 @12:18PM (#40200335)

Hey now, I like bullet points myself, as I'm easily distracted otherwise.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:SB-1047 will stifle open-source AI and decrease safety by shkkmo on Monday April 29, 2024 @11:07AM (#40199288)

This is going to become one the the site no-nos. What does this assertion add to the discussion? Is there any argument that serves as refutation?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:SB-1047 will stifle open-source AI and decrease safety by pjc50 on Monday April 29, 2024 @11:42AM (#40199760)

If an article is AI, it's essentially spam, because there could be a thousand more similar written.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:SB-1047 will stifle open-source AI and decrease safety by airstrike on Monday April 29, 2024 @11:47AM (#40199821)

Raising awareness so others too can flag TFA

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:SB-1047 will stifle open-source AI and decrease safety by shkkmo on Monday April 29, 2024 @04:45PM (#40203905)

The quality of the article is what should drive voting and flagging.

Your personal opinion as to what level of AI tooling was used in crafting the content is a low value signal and posting that speculation without meaningfully engaging in the content is as low value as commenting to say "this article sucks".

Personally, I think this would be a very strange place to find pute AI genetated content. This is a personal statement that was submitted to the state, and posted under a real name under a site the poster has a professional association with. I think that any "strangeness" in formating a wording comes from the role this text serves, as a public comment intended to affect policy.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:SB-1047 will stifle open-source AI and decrease safety by sensanaty on Monday April 29, 2024 @12:13PM (#40200230)

Why would I want to read some AI-generated slop? It's no different to spam, other than techbros being okay shoving it everywhere and anywhere it doesn't belong.

[ Parent | on HN ]