News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Answering Legal Questions with LLMs by tagersenim on Monday April 29, 2024 @10:34AM (#40198838)
Many laws, especially GDPR, can only be interpreted in conjunction with a lot of guidelines (WP29 for example), interpretations by the local Data Protection Authority, decisions by local and European courts, etc.

Given all of this information, I think the bot will be able to formulate and answer. However, the bot first needs to know what information is needed.

If a lawyer has to feed the bot certain specific parts of all of these documents, they might as well write the answer down themselves.

Re:Answering Legal Questions with LLMs by Workaccount2 on Monday April 29, 2024 @10:50AM (#40199052)
I'm surprised Gemini 1.5 isn't getting more attention. Despite being marginally worse than the leaders, its still solid and you can dump 975,000 (!) tokens into it and still have ~75,000 to play with.

I've been using it lately for microcontoller coding, and I can just dump the whole 500 page MCU reference manual into it before starting, and it gives tailored code for the specific MCU I am using. Total game changer.

Re:Answering Legal Questions with LLMs by lionkor on Monday April 29, 2024 @11:05AM (#40199270)
Is the resulting (C) code maintainable, unit testable, do you understand it? If your answer is "I'll just ask gemini to explain it", I will laugh sarcastically and then sob for the poor people around the hardware you program for
Re:Answering Legal Questions with LLMs by Workaccount2 on Monday April 29, 2024 @11:31AM (#40199621)
I haven't had an issue (at least more than what is expected). I am also an EE, not an SWE. I use it for internal test systems and it has saved me tons of time that I would have had to spend combing the reference manual.

As I am sure you know, embedded code often has terrible portability and requires lots of "check the 500 page datasheet" to get stuff working properly.

Re:Answering Legal Questions with LLMs by lionkor on Monday April 29, 2024 @12:02PM (#40200075)
Interesting, thank you!