What I am saying that if someone starts out with a lot of unsubstantiated and vaguely defined posturing with the conclusion that the leaders of one of the most hands down successful and interesting open source projects in recent years, they are being disingenuous to say the least.

The purpose is to warn people so that they not fall for what sounds like really nice things, but that in effect just is nothing but empty words.

Which I think is fairly evident if you read my _whole_ comment.