Re:Supabase Storage: now supports the S3 protocol
by filleokus on Friday April 19, 2024 @04:46AM
(#40084587)
Do you think Supabase Storage (now or in the future) could be an attractive standalone S3 provider as an alternative to e.g MinIO?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Supabase Storage: now supports the S3 protocol
by kiwicopple on Friday April 19, 2024 @04:56AM
(#40084630)
It's more of a "accessibility layer" on top of S3 or any other s3-compatible backend (which means that it also works with MinIO out-of-the-box [0])
I don't think we'll ever build the underlying storage layer. I'm a big fan of what the Tigris[1] team have built if you're looking for other good s3 alternatives
[0] https://github.com/supabase/storage/blob/master/docker-compo...
[1] Tigris: https://tigrisdata.com
Re:Supabase Storage: now supports the S3 protocol
by masfuerte on Friday April 19, 2024 @11:35AM
(#40088133)
I'm still confused. Who is paying Amazon? Is it
1. You buy the storage from Amazon so I pay you and don't interact with Amazon at all or
2. I buy storage from Amazon and you provide managed access to it?
Re:Supabase Storage: now supports the S3 protocol
by kiwicopple on Monday April 22, 2024 @12:31AM
(#40111422)
it's 1 - you pay us, we pay AWS.
In the future we will likely provide "bring your own s3" (2)
Re:Supabase Storage: now supports the S3 protocol
by ovaistariq on Friday April 19, 2024 @11:11PM
(#40094434)
I appreciate the callout to Tigris. Now it’s super easy to use Tigris with Supabase for all those files.