Re:Meta Llama 3
by eigenvalue on Thursday April 18, 2024 @01:59PM
(#40078909)
For sure. I just started watching the new Dwarkesh interview with Zuck that was just released ( https://t.co/f4h7ko0M7q ) and you can just tell from the first few minutes that he simply has a different level of enthusiasm and passion and level of engagement than 99% of big tech CEOs.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I've never heard of this person, but many of the questions he asks Zuck show a total lack of any insight in this field. How did this interview even happen?
I actually think Dwarkesh is usually pretty good - this interview wasn’t his best (maybe he was a bit nervous because it’s Zuck?) but his show has had a lot of good conversations that get more into the weeds than other shows in my experience
Re:Meta Llama 3
by jesseduffield on Friday April 19, 2024 @06:28AM
(#40085070)
Seconding this opinion: Dwarkesh's podcast is really good. I haven't watched all of the Zuck interview but I recommend others to check out a couple extra episodes to get a more representative sample. He is one of the few postcasters who does his homework.
He talks a bit too fast, but I kinda get the vibe that he's genuinely interested in these topics.
He’s built up an impressive amount of clout over a short period of time, mostly by interviewing interesting guests on his podcast while not boring listeners to death (unlike a certain other interviewer with high-caliber guests that shall remain nameless).
What's the meaning of life though, and why is it love?
thanks for sharing! he looks more human compared to all the previous interviews I've seen.
Re:Meta Llama 3
by courseofaction on Friday April 19, 2024 @05:15PM
(#40091981)
Who cares, listen to what he says.
38:30 Zuckerberg states that they won't release models once they're sufficiently powerful.
It's OpenAI again, facebook has burnt all customer trust for years and the fact they changed their name to "Meta" actually worked.
Re:Meta Llama 3
by FuckButtons on Sunday April 21, 2024 @02:19AM
(#40103545)
I mean, he was pretty open with his motivations if you ask me, open source exists because it is a positive sum game, he gets something in return for being open, if that calculus is no longer true then he has no incentive to be open.