News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:PuTTY vulnerability vuln-p521-bias by e79 on Monday April 15, 2024 @11:41PM (#40048145)
I did a bit of a deep dive into this, in case anyone is interested. I think reading the code is a great way to understand _why_ this vulnerability happened:

https://ericrafaloff.com/your-putty-generated-nist-p-521-cli...

Re:PuTTY vulnerability vuln-p521-bias by ki85squared on Tuesday April 16, 2024 @12:54AM (#40048494)
Thank you. Your writeup helped make it click!
Re:PuTTY vulnerability vuln-p521-bias by Elucalidavah on Tuesday April 16, 2024 @02:17AM (#40048883)
Your title says "PuTTY-Generated" but the OP article says "The problem is not with how the key was originally generated; it doesn't matter whether it came from PuTTYgen or somewhere else. What matters is whether it was ever used with PuTTY or Pageant".
Re:PuTTY vulnerability vuln-p521-bias by e79 on Tuesday April 16, 2024 @08:12AM (#40050996)
Good catch! I wrote the title before I had dug into the matter and forgot to update it. Thanks for pointing that out.

Any k generation and subsequent signature generation are going to be impacted.

Re:PuTTY vulnerability vuln-p521-bias by Aachen on Tuesday April 16, 2024 @02:36AM (#40048976)
The answer being, per that post: author was worried about low quality randomness on Windows and ran it through a sha512 hash function which outputs fewer than 521 bits so the remaining ones will be left zero
Re:PuTTY vulnerability vuln-p521-bias by e79 on Tuesday April 16, 2024 @08:24AM (#40051084)